Picasso was not an ‘artist’

He was just a very creative craftsman

The Rooster 1938 by Picasso.
The Rooster (1938) by Picasso. (Wikiart)

Let me explain. Why was Picasso not an ‘artist’? Because all he ever did was create pretty and interesting pictures. Creating prettiness (and variants thereof, including ‘the interesting’) is the realm of crafting, not of ‘art’. For something to reach the level of art…

--

--

--

Artist and writer; artworks, prose and poetry.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

TriumphX Publishes the First NFT Series with yooniverse(Yunseongjoong), Editor-in-chief of Runner’s…

Stendhal Syndrome; my experience

New Work: Waiting.

5 Ideas for Making Money with your Art…Without Selling it

To NFT or Not to NFT

Strada Takes the New Art Market by Storm

Situations we imagine

How Witchcraft Became a Symbol of Women’s Power

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Jakob Zaaiman

Jakob Zaaiman

Artist and writer; artworks, prose and poetry.

More from Medium

Growing up without the Internet in the Internet Age

Portrait of an Artist

Realism In Philosophy And In Art

VR in Medicine: Can Your Oculus Cure Cancer?

Child using a VR headset